denies Platform Ujaldón Enrique statements in which blame the association for the preservation of the garden of Murcia, Huermur the delay in the declaration of San BIC Esteban.
The Platform for the Defence of the Archaeological Heritage of San Esteban rejects the statements of the Director General of Fine Arts and Cultural Heritage Ujaldón Enrique Benítez on Saturday October 9 at the opening of Manifesta 8, in which he blamed the delay in the declaration of St. Stephen's BIC archaeological Huermur the action brought by and waiting for the answer from the experts.
The Platform states that:
1. The resource is no impediment to Huermur BIC declare the site of San Esteban, since that appeal and receive a response May 13, the date from which the silence of the Administration means the dismissal of the appeal and therefore that is the answer, according to the Administrative Procedure Law 30/92 Article 115.2, as the Act clearly expressed within three months of the Administration to respond to a remedy of appeal.
2. Have fulfilled all the conditions for the declaration of BIC, since they have the support of the Advisory Institutions and that is what establishes the Heritage Act.
3. The statement of St. Stephen BIC archaeological site, to ensure that if in the vicinity of the archaeological site belonging to appear "Arrabal the Arrixaca "had all the same protection as the site of San Esteban.
4. The Platform wants to remember that soon will be a year since it began proceedings to declare San Esteban of cultural interest, without having had so far not even a decent protection. Emphasizes the possibility that he might suffer the same fate that more than 200 records BIC expired during the tenure of Lord Ujaldón such as: the Teatro Cervantes de Abarán, the parish church of San Bartolomé de Librilla, the palatial residence of the Marquis of Rozalejo in San Javier or the Building "La Tercia" (Palace of the Knights of Santiago) in Caravaca de Cross. If this happens the site would be administratively unprotected.
Platform For all these require the Director General of Fine Arts BIC declaring the site of San Esteban at the earliest, as they meet all the requirements set by the Law on Cultural Heritage in the Region of Murcia.
Other important information
- Appeals to the height of Huermur came shortly after the opening of the record of San Esteban, 23 February 2010. Under Article 115 of Law 30/92 of administrative procedure, this is the last 'obstacle' that can make the decision to open the site BIC St. Stephen and is void to spend 3 months of its submission.
Article 115. Deadlines.
1. The deadline for filing the administrative appeal is one month, if the act is explicit. If it were not, the term shall be three months and will, for the applicant and other interested parties, from the day following that on which, according to their specific rules, will result in the effects of administrative silence. After this period without having filed the appeal, the decision shall be final for all purposes.
2. The deadline for issuing and notifying the resolution is three months. After this time no decision is reached, can understand the appeal dismissed, except in the case provided in Article 43.2, second paragraph.
3. against the decision of an administrative appeal will not fit any other administrative appeal, except for special review resources in cases provided for in Article 118.1.
also be the reason for the action of Huermur was to extend the protection of the site to surrounding areas and never doubted the interest and value in the Andalus district. Being part of an urban area, it is logical that in the vicinity of St. Stephen is the extension and even the remains of the ancient wall suburb, whose perimeter had to be extended with the discovery of SanEsteban with respect to the hypothesis posed earlier by historians. As we all know, the walls are declared immediately BIC throughout the English territory.
- The options that were considered by the Directorate General of BB.AA, according to Mr. Ujaldón are:
a) Monument: the construction or work product of human activity, of outstanding historical, architectural, artistic, archaeological, ethnographic, scientific, industrial, technical or social, including furniture, fixtures and fittings expressly indicate as an integral part of it, and that in itself constitutes a single unit.
b) Garden history: the designated area, the product of man-management of natural elements, sometimes supplemented by masonry structures, and estimated interest on the basis of their origin or past historical or aesthetic values, sensory or botanical .
c) Archaeological Zone: the place or natural setting in which real or personal property are subject to be studied in archaeological methodology, as if they were on the surface and underground or underwater.
The site of St. Stephen was not finished digging, so clearly framed in the third option: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE. The choice of historic garden is ridiculous, because there are no natural elements order (during the construction of parking all vegetation was removed from the site) and the meaning of the monument is too vague to what the suburb of Arrixaca need.
- The following links you can check for opening many files BIC initiated by the Directorate of BB.AA which lapsed in recent months:
BORM November 12, 2009 Abarán Teatro Cervantes, Parish Church of St. Bartolomé de Librilla and House-Palace of the Marquis of San Javier Rozalejo
BORM December 11, 2009 Resolution declaring the forfeiture of an action of BIC for the building "La Tercia" (Palace of the Knights of Santiago), Caravaca de la Cruz
BORM November 21, 2009 Tower of Albuquerque in Aljucer (Murcia), Wheel of Lorquí, meadow and the Roman villa at The Cypress, in Jumilla, etc.
- Liaison statements Ujaldón: Murcia 20 minutes
0 comments:
Post a Comment